Uploaded image for project: 'KFS Request'
  1. KFS Request
  2. KFSMI-3654

Multiple action requests generated for Accounting Reviewer role

    Details

    • Type: Enhancement
    • Status: Rice Roadblock
    • Priority: Critical
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: TBD
    • Sub-Committee:
      SYS
    • Impacted Modules:
      System

      Description

      I set up a group called TEST GROUP in CNV and assigned them to the Accounting Reviewer role for DI doc types for org BA PARK (I used the Organization Review document to set this up). When I route a DI for BA PARK now it shows up generating 2 requests for TEST GROUP. There are 2 BA PARK accounts on this document but I don't think organization reviewer approvals worked like this previously (generating mulitple requests based on the number of accounting lines that match the criteria) I thought we always generated only one.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            jksmith James Smith added a comment -

            I think we should create a jira for multiple copies of searchable attributes; I'll try to get to that this afternoon.

            Thanks for looking, Jonathan!

            Show
            jksmith James Smith added a comment - I think we should create a jira for multiple copies of searchable attributes; I'll try to get to that this afternoon. Thanks for looking, Jonathan!
            Hide
            jksmith James Smith added a comment -

            There's a jira for the multiple searchable attributes already: KULRICE-5591. I'll check with Ailish if we want to prioritize.

            Show
            jksmith James Smith added a comment - There's a jira for the multiple searchable attributes already: KULRICE-5591 . I'll check with Ailish if we want to prioritize.
            Hide
            jksmith James Smith added a comment - - edited

            Also re: these two jiras KFSCNTRB-1398 and KFSCNTRB-1045. I'm hearing that we needed to revert KFSCNTRB-1045 for some reason.

            Show
            jksmith James Smith added a comment - - edited Also re: these two jiras KFSCNTRB-1398 and KFSCNTRB-1045 . I'm hearing that we needed to revert KFSCNTRB-1045 for some reason.
            Hide
            jksmith James Smith added a comment -

            Though the changes to KRP for instance may be very useful. We'll discuss prioritization as a whole on Monday. Thank you Jonathan!

            Show
            jksmith James Smith added a comment - Though the changes to KRP for instance may be very useful. We'll discuss prioritization as a whole on Monday. Thank you Jonathan!
            Hide
            jkeller Jonathan Keller added a comment -

            The KRP change is farther reaching - as it mucks with the ability to upload files unless every place which attempts to do so adds some code to turn it back on. It does however, greatly increase the speed (by reducing network load) when submitting documents with lots of fields. (or lots of accounting lines)

            Show
            jkeller Jonathan Keller added a comment - The KRP change is farther reaching - as it mucks with the ability to upload files unless every place which attempts to do so adds some code to turn it back on. It does however, greatly increase the speed (by reducing network load) when submitting documents with lots of fields. (or lots of accounting lines)

              People

              • Reporter:
                ddorsey Damon Dorsey
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                5 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated: