KPME
  1. KPME
  2. KPME-3019

Rice fix needed: Required errors should not show on new lines in collections

        Details

        • Type: Task Task
        • Status: Open Open
        • Priority: Major Major
        • Resolution: Unresolved
        • Affects Version/s: None
        • Fix Version/s: 2.2.0
        • Component/s: Position
        • Security Level: Public (Public: Anyone can view)
        • Labels:
          None

          Description

          On Position and Position Classification maintenance documents, in the collections, sometimes "Required" errors show up in the new lines and there's no way to get rid of them. We should not do required validation on new lines. Please research if there's any parameters that we can use to turn that off or if it's a KRAD bug that we need to report to Rice team.

            Issue Links

            is fixed by

            Improvement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. KULRICE-9586 Need to avoid required validation checks on addLine

            • Major - Major loss of function.
            • Closed - The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct. Issues which are not closed can be reopened.

            Improvement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. KULRICE-11729 Selectively disable client side validation on KRAD collections

            • Major - Major loss of function.
            • Closed - The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct. Issues which are not closed can be reopened.
            is related to

            Sub Task - A small part of the whole. KPME-3145 Utilize "Add Line" button from KRAD in collection sections of KRAD maint docs

            • Major - Major loss of function.
            • Closed - The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct. Issues which are not closed can be reopened.

              Activity

              Hide
              Permalink
              Umang Mehta (Inactive) added a comment -

              Sorry. By Mistake mentioned KPME-3019 while commenting instead of KPME-3119

              Show
              Umang Mehta (Inactive) added a comment - Sorry. By Mistake mentioned KPME-3019 while commenting instead of KPME-3119

                People

                • Assignee:
                  Unassigned
                  Reporter:
                  Ying Zhou (Inactive)
                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  Watchers:
                  2 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  • Created:
                    Updated:

                    Time Tracking

                    Estimated:
                    Original Estimate - 1 day
                    1d
                    Remaining:
                    Remaining Estimate - 0 minutes
                    0m
                    Logged:
                    Time Spent - 1 day
                    1d

                      Structure Helper Panel