Uploaded image for project: 'Kuali Rice Roadmap'
  1. Kuali Rice Roadmap
  2. KRRM-68

Implement proper handling of FERPA and FIPPA regulations

    Details

    • Type: Rice Enhancement
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: KIM
    • Labels:
      None
    • Rice Theme:
      Kuali Application Business Drivers
    • Priority Score:
      14
    • Impact if not Implemented:
      Applications/Institutions will need to create customizations to accomidated for this compliance requirement taking away development time and adding another step to check when a Rice upgrade is done.
    • Priority - KFS:
      High
    • Priority - KC:
      High
    • Priority - KS:
      Critical
    • Priority - Rice:
      High
    • Theme:
      Kuali Application Business Drivers
    • Application Impact:
      Low
    • Effort Estimate:
      Low ~ 200 hrs

      Description

      currently via KIM screens you can fully mask a person's data if they have chosen to suppress their data. This can be done by select all of the suppress flags on the KIM person document. . If a Student has selected to suppress their data(FERPA)our only option is to fully suppress the data so no-one can view it. For applications in which Student records are processed, this is problematic. There are some people who need to and are authorized to view the FERPA protected students but with the current suppression solutions, we can't allow some to see and others not to see.

      a FERPA flag associated with Student Records and permissions for viewing FERPA data for those who are authorized would be a possible solution.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            ewestfal Eric Westfall added a comment -

            There was a working group commissioned from the KAI to discuss this topic and how "privacy preferences" are currently implemented in KIM.

            Show
            ewestfal Eric Westfall added a comment - There was a working group commissioned from the KAI to discuss this topic and how "privacy preferences" are currently implemented in KIM.
            Hide
            kymber Kymber Horn added a comment -

            KFS would like to see in 1.2 or 1.3.

            Show
            kymber Kymber Horn added a comment - KFS would like to see in 1.2 or 1.3.
            Hide
            cfairlie Cath Fairlie (Inactive) added a comment -

            GLB and HIPPA should be included. Also possibly field level authorization/masking.

            Show
            cfairlie Cath Fairlie (Inactive) added a comment - GLB and HIPPA should be included. Also possibly field level authorization/masking.
            Hide
            lschultz Lori Schultz (Inactive) added a comment -

            I would like additional functional description for this item, to help understand the impact. Is this related to KRRM-44?

            Show
            lschultz Lori Schultz (Inactive) added a comment - I would like additional functional description for this item, to help understand the impact. Is this related to KRRM-44 ?

              People

              • Assignee:
                sjc37 Sarah Christen (Inactive)
                Reporter:
                ewestfal Eric Westfall
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated: