Uploaded image for project: 'Kuali Rice Development'
  1. Kuali Rice Development
  2. KULRICE-10637

AFT Failure PeopleFlow Create New Expected ENROUTE but is FINAL

    Details

    • Type: Bug Fix
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Affects Version/s: 2.3.1
    • Fix Version/s: 2.4
    • Component/s: Development, Regression
    • Security Level: Public (Public: Anyone can view)
    • Labels:
      None
    • Sprint:
      2.4.0-m4 Dev Sprint 4 (Real)
    • KAI Review Status:
      Not Required
    • KTI Review Status:
      Not Required
    • Code Review Status:
      Not Required

      Description

      >>>Fix on 2.3 branch<<<

      http://ci.rice.kuali.org/job/rice-2.3-smoke-test-new/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/edu.samplu.mainmenu.test/PeopleFlowCreateNewSTJUnitNavGen/testPeopleFlowCreateNewNav/

      AFT Step: Open /portal.do
      AFT Step: Click Main Menu link.
      AFT Step: Click People Flow link.
      AFT Step: Click Create New link.
      AFT Step: Doc Id is 3104
      AFT Step: Type into document.documentHeader.documentDescription the text: Description for Document
      AFT Step: Select KUALI - Kuali Systems from document.newMaintainableObject.dataObject.namespaceCode
      AFT Step: Type into document.newMaintainableObject.dataObject.name the text: Document Name1391068126971
      AFT Step: Add Member kr
      AFT Step: Type into newCollectionLines['document.newMaintainableObject.dataObject.members'].memberName the text: kr
      AFT Step: Add Member admin
      AFT Step: Type into newCollectionLines['document.newMaintainableObject.dataObject.members'].memberName the text: admin
      AFT Step: Click submit button.
      AFT Step: Document Search is 3104 present?
      AFT Step: Is doc status enroute?
      AFT Step: Expected "ENROUTE" but saw "FINAL" instead in class edu.sampleu.main.PeopleFlowCreateNewNavAft

      Abbreviated test name: PeopleFlowCreateNewNavAft.testPeopleFlowCreateNewNav
      Full test name: edu.sampleu.main.PeopleFlowCreateNewNavAft.testPeopleFlowCreateNewNav
      Test results url: http://ci.rice.kuali.org/job/rice-2.4-test-functional-saucelabs/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/edu.sampleu.main/PeopleFlowCreateNewNavAft/testPeopleFlowCreateNewNav/
      Error Message: Expected "ENROUTE" but saw "FINAL" instead in class edu.sampleu.main.PeopleFlowCreateNewNavAft

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            jcoltrin Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            This doesn't happen when manually run by Gayathri and runs locally for to Erik M. Looks like an issue with how the test is being run in CI, not with the software itself.

            On 1/13/14, at 3:12 PM, Gayathri Athreya wrote:
            > Jessica, Erik tells me that the test works for him locally but fails in CI for some unknown reason and I've tested what I think the test does and it works for me so it looks like the test is not an issue so far.

            Show
            jcoltrin Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - - edited This doesn't happen when manually run by Gayathri and runs locally for to Erik M. Looks like an issue with how the test is being run in CI, not with the software itself. On 1/13/14, at 3:12 PM, Gayathri Athreya wrote: > Jessica, Erik tells me that the test works for him locally but fails in CI for some unknown reason and I've tested what I think the test does and it works for me so it looks like the test is not an issue so far.
            Hide
            acampbell Adam Campbell (Inactive) added a comment -

            Confirmed this seems to be working fine.
            Created new PeopleFlow doc.
            Blanket Approved.
            Searched for doc in Doc Search.
            Confirmed status was FINAL.

            (tested on env2/2.3.3)

            Show
            acampbell Adam Campbell (Inactive) added a comment - Confirmed this seems to be working fine. Created new PeopleFlow doc. Blanket Approved. Searched for doc in Doc Search. Confirmed status was FINAL. (tested on env2/2.3.3)
            Hide
            acampbell Adam Campbell (Inactive) added a comment -

            Please investigate test script and determine why it only fails in the AFT, not manually.

            Show
            acampbell Adam Campbell (Inactive) added a comment - Please investigate test script and determine why it only fails in the AFT, not manually.
            Hide
            eghm-kuali-m Erik Meade added a comment -

            When I first created this I had Blanket Approve in the summary and description, however the failing tests are not blanket approve tests. Please note this is also failing in 2.3

            Show
            eghm-kuali-m Erik Meade added a comment - When I first created this I had Blanket Approve in the summary and description, however the failing tests are not blanket approve tests. Please note this is also failing in 2.3
            Hide
            jcoltrin Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment -

            Pulling out of 2.3.4 for now. 2.3.x is for critical bug fixes needed by applications. Checking with KC to see if this is critical for them.

            Show
            jcoltrin Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - Pulling out of 2.3.4 for now. 2.3.x is for critical bug fixes needed by applications. Checking with KC to see if this is critical for them.
            Hide
            jcoltrin Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            [2/10/14 9:57:12 AM] Gayathri Athreya: I spoke to Erik and tested again in 2.3.4 and it seems alright
            [2/10/14 9:57:18 AM] Gayathri Athreya: not sure why the test is failing though

            Since it's a test issue, this doesn't need to be addressed in 2.3.x and can stay in 2.4.

            Show
            jcoltrin Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - - edited [2/10/14 9:57:12 AM] Gayathri Athreya: I spoke to Erik and tested again in 2.3.4 and it seems alright [2/10/14 9:57:18 AM] Gayathri Athreya: not sure why the test is failing though Since it's a test issue, this doesn't need to be addressed in 2.3.x and can stay in 2.4.
            Hide
            cniesen Claus Niesen added a comment -

            not a 2.4 test

            Show
            cniesen Claus Niesen added a comment - not a 2.4 test
            Hide
            eghm-kuali-m Erik Meade added a comment -

            The 2.3 failure is from the test not being specific enough, this has been fixed in 2.4.

            Show
            eghm-kuali-m Erik Meade added a comment - The 2.3 failure is from the test not being specific enough, this has been fixed in 2.4.

              People

              • Assignee:
                Unassigned
                Reporter:
                eghm-kuali-m Erik Meade
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 4 hours
                  4h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 4 hours
                  4h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - Not Specified
                  Not Specified