Kuali Rice Development
  1. Kuali Rice Development
  2. KULRICE-11444

Manually confirm AFT failures - 2.4.0-m4, Sprint 2

    Details

    • Type: Task Task
    • Status: Closed Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 2.4
    • Fix Version/s: 2.4
    • Component/s: Quality Assurance
    • Security Level: Public (Public: Anyone can view)
    • Labels:
      None
    • Similar issues:
      KULRICE-11568Analyze CI Failures for 2.4.0-m4 QA Sprint 2
      KULRICE-13718Analyze AFT failures - 2.5.0-m3 QA Sprint 2
      KULRICE-13701Analyze AFT failures - QA 2.5.0-m4 Sprint 2
      KULRICE-13409Analyze AFT failures - QA 2.5.0-m5 Sprint 2
      KULRICE-11472Analize Ci Failures for 2.4.0-m4 QA Sprint 1
      KULRICE-11701Analyze CI Failures for 2.4.0-m4 QA Sprint 3
      KULRICE-13752Analyze AFT failures - 2.5.0-m2 Sprint 4
      KULRICE-11108Analyze CI Failures for 2.4.0-m3 QA Sprint 2
      KULRICE-13485AFT gap analysis - 2.5.0-m3 QA Sprint 2
      KULRICE-13405AFT gap analysis - QA 2.5.0-m4 Sprint 2
    • Rice Team:
      QA
    • Sprint:
      2.4.0-m4 QA Sprint 2
    • KAI Review Status:
      Not Required
    • KTI Review Status:
      Not Required
    • Code Review Status:
      Not Required

      Description

      Manually validate and document repro steps for reported AFT failures.

        Activity

        Hide
        Adam Campbell (Inactive) added a comment -

        Erik has been including human-readable manual steps in many of the newer AFTs, so the focus should be on older AFTs.

        [1/16/14, 3:49:22 PM] EGHM: maybe sort by created date and work the oldest first
        [1/16/14, 3:50:10 PM] EGHM: which would also be good cuz the older the AFT the more likely it has been "accidentally" fixed and is not longer an issue

        Show
        Adam Campbell (Inactive) added a comment - Erik has been including human-readable manual steps in many of the newer AFTs, so the focus should be on older AFTs. [1/16/14, 3:49:22 PM] EGHM: maybe sort by created date and work the oldest first [1/16/14, 3:50:10 PM] EGHM: which would also be good cuz the older the AFT the more likely it has been "accidentally" fixed and is not longer an issue

          People

          • Assignee:
            Adam Campbell (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Adam Campbell (Inactive)
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Time Tracking

              Estimated:
              Original Estimate - 1 week
              1w
              Remaining:
              Remaining Estimate - 1 week
              1w
              Logged:
              Time Spent - Not Specified
              Not Specified

                Agile

                  Structure Helper Panel