Details
-
Type:
Improvement
-
Status:
Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Complete
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: 0.9.3 - Build 3, 0.9.3
-
Component/s: Development
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:all
-
Similar issues:
KULRICE-815 Mark required rule fields from attributes with an asterix KULRICE-4156Required fields on group document not properly marked KULRICE-1886On Namespace document choices for Required and Active on a Default Attribute record don't hold KULRICE-1487Add REQUIRED and ACTIVE as fields to the Namspace Dflt Attributes table KULRICE-8090The Namespace Code and the Name should include "*" as they are required fields. KULRICE-7199 Required fields not marked required on Send Event and Send Simple Notification KULRICE-2091Ensure that group type specific attributes only show up if they are active and that they are marked required if that's how they are defined for the group type KULRICE-8096Data Mapping Field Definition, Business Object Component Lookup - Namespace Duplications - KFS-PURAP/KFS-PDP KULRICE-4326prd:eDoc Lite:org.kuali.rice.kew.exception.WorkflowRuntimeException: org.kuali.rice.kew.exception.WorkflowRuntimeException: Error validating attribute edu.iu.uis.eden.routetemplate.attribute.AccountBasedOrgReviewAttribute Account Number is Required Acc... KULRICE-6867On Term Spec maint doc, namespace, name, and data type should all be required. -
Rice Module:KIM
-
Application Requirement:Rice
Description
In the Namespace eDoc, on the Namespace Attributes tab, there are checkboxes to indicate whether the attribute you are creating is required, and if it is active. Checkbox entries should not be marked as required fields for the eDoc - it has no meaning in this context.
Please remove the asterisk from these options. This is consistent with KFS display of the Active Indicator checkbox in the maintenance eDocs.
Activity
Nirmal, all that needs to happen with this one is remove the "required" property on the two attributes in the NamespaceDefaultAttribute.xml DD file.
Then test to see if the * are gone on the Namespace maint doc.
Hi Aaron,
There is no 'required' property for these two attributes in the NamespaceDefaultAttribute.xml DD file. I just added 'required' property and set as false, though the * were there. so I then changed the required property as false in the NamespaceMaintenanceDocument.xml for these attributes, now the * are gone.
is that OK? shall I commit the changes?
Yep, that should work, though I think we want to remove the required property from the NamespaceDefaultAttribute.xml and just have the ones set to false in the NamespaceMaintenanceDocument.xml file.
Then I would say go ahead and commit after testing.
tested and the changes are committed
changed from bug to improvement