Details

    • Type: Task Task
    • Status: Closed Closed
    • Priority: Critical Critical
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 2.0.0-m8
    • Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-b1, 2.0
    • Security Level: Public (Public: Anyone can view)
    • Labels:
      None
    • Similar issues:
      KULRICE-1695Update rice-site under distributionManagement in pom.xml to use the new Rice dav
      KULRICE-3740Fix nightly deployment issues
      KULRICE-4806Update the rice-site url in the main pom.xml file
      KULRICE-4787DirectInquiry broken when rice is deployed as ROOT context
      KULRICE-1345Need new button images for Rice web site
      KULRICE-6956Create nightly deployment to one of the Rice environments for the 2.2 branch
      KULRICE-1475Deploy a test Rice Standalone application to a test environment
      KULRICE-1231Document Deployment Options for Rice - embedded/federated vs. standalone
      KULRICE-7022Cleanup, simplify, and unify Rice deployment environments
      KULRICE-2815 Deploy CAS-enabled Rice standalone server to test environment
    • KAI Review Status:
      Not Required
    • KTI Review Status:
      Not Required

      Description

      The Jenkins job responsible for creating the Rice Maven site is not running to completion correctly. Appears to be something odd about how the gmaven plugin is interacting with the javadoc plugin when the javadoc plugin goes to create the rolled up javadocs for the full Rice code base.

        Activity

        Hide
        Travis Schneeberger added a comment -

        Leo: The alternative to gmaven has been released a little while back. It would not be that hard for me to switch to that. The biggest thing is testing that eclipse integration works. You think we should go down that route?

        Show
        Travis Schneeberger added a comment - Leo: The alternative to gmaven has been released a little while back. It would not be that hard for me to switch to that. The biggest thing is testing that eclipse integration works. You think we should go down that route?
        Hide
        Leo Przybylski (Inactive) added a comment -

        If the plan going forward is to use a gmaven eclipse integration, I'd say sure. I'm just not so sure it is. You have to get buy-in from the teams, don't you? If it's eclipse integration, wouldn't that lock you into Eclipse? IDEA users going to be ok with that?

        Show
        Leo Przybylski (Inactive) added a comment - If the plan going forward is to use a gmaven eclipse integration, I'd say sure. I'm just not so sure it is. You have to get buy-in from the teams, don't you? If it's eclipse integration, wouldn't that lock you into Eclipse? IDEA users going to be ok with that?
        Hide
        Travis Schneeberger added a comment -

        no it doesn't lock you into eclipse

        all it is the the compiler used by eclipse as a maven plugin. I think also, we will probably want to move to this plugin if gmaven continues on it's current path of not being maintained.

        Show
        Travis Schneeberger added a comment - no it doesn't lock you into eclipse all it is the the compiler used by eclipse as a maven plugin. I think also, we will probably want to move to this plugin if gmaven continues on it's current path of not being maintained.
        Hide
        Leo Przybylski (Inactive) added a comment -

        There needs to be a way to qualify eclipse plugin vs. maven plugin by eclipse.org. That aside, I think it's a great idea. If we are planning to move in that direction, it makes sense to not waste effort on a fix that gets thrown out.

        Show
        Leo Przybylski (Inactive) added a comment - There needs to be a way to qualify eclipse plugin vs. maven plugin by eclipse.org. That aside, I think it's a great idea. If we are planning to move in that direction, it makes sense to not waste effort on a fix that gets thrown out.
        Hide
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment -

        updating priority since we're going to need this for beta. The last site update for m9 was Last Published: 2011-09-15

        Show
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - updating priority since we're going to need this for beta. The last site update for m9 was Last Published: 2011-09-15
        Hide
        Jeff Caddel (Inactive) added a comment -

        Changed reporting option on the configuration of the maven-javadoc-plugin used by the maven-site-plugin from aggregate and test-aggregate to javadoc and test-javadoc with the aggregate flag set to true. Memory leak somewhere in the maven-javadoc-plugin was causing the issue. Now produces the same javadoc as before.

        http://site.origin.kuali.org/rice/2.0.0-b1-SNAPSHOT/ is up to date with the latest

        Show
        Jeff Caddel (Inactive) added a comment - Changed reporting option on the configuration of the maven-javadoc-plugin used by the maven-site-plugin from aggregate and test-aggregate to javadoc and test-javadoc with the aggregate flag set to true. Memory leak somewhere in the maven-javadoc-plugin was causing the issue. Now produces the same javadoc as before. http://site.origin.kuali.org/rice/2.0.0-b1-SNAPSHOT/ is up to date with the latest
        Hide
        Rice-CI User (Inactive) added a comment -

        Integrated in rice-trunk-nightly #233 (See http://ci.rice.kuali.org/job/rice-trunk-nightly/233/)
        KULRICE-5640 Update to version 19 of the kuali-common pom with better default javadoc reporting options
        KULRICE-5640 site deployment cleanup
        KULRICE-5640 Remove maven-site-plugin config. Core issue here was a memory leak in one of the reports for the javadoc plugin which can be controlled via pom properties

        Show
        Rice-CI User (Inactive) added a comment - Integrated in rice-trunk-nightly #233 (See http://ci.rice.kuali.org/job/rice-trunk-nightly/233/ ) KULRICE-5640 Update to version 19 of the kuali-common pom with better default javadoc reporting options KULRICE-5640 site deployment cleanup KULRICE-5640 Remove maven-site-plugin config. Core issue here was a memory leak in one of the reports for the javadoc plugin which can be controlled via pom properties
        Hide
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment -

        Closing since these items are now in the release notes.

        Show
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - Closing since these items are now in the release notes.

          People

          • Assignee:
            Leo Przybylski (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Jeff Caddel (Inactive)
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Structure Helper Panel