Details

    • Type: Task Task
    • Status: Open Open
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: Backlog
    • Component/s: Documentation
    • Labels:
    • Similar issues:
      KULRICE-1036Support Session Scope for Kuali Documents
      KULRICE-9053Cannot perform multiple KRAD document actions with certain browsers
      KULRICE-6995Add support for "fluent" builders to Kuali Rice apis
      KULRICE-491stop disabling browser buttons whenever a kuali document is displayed
      KULRICE-8841Bad description of Rice in "Introduction to Kuali Rice 2.2.0" document
      KULRICE-10368Support for HTML 5 semantic tags
      KULRICE-2855Document Kuali Rice Standalone Server installation and configuration
      KULRICE-13572Revise Kuali Rice QA Plan
      KULRICE-5021Implement a more concrete concept of "Applications" in Kuali Rice.
      KULRICE-9525Document best-practices for using JPA with Kuali Rice
    • Rice Module:
      Rice Core

      Description

      I'm not sure where exactly this should go in the docs, but it comes up fairly frequently regarding which browsers we officially support. So we should include some documentation on that in the release documentation for Rice 2.0.

        Activity

        Hide
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment -

        not critical so moving to 2.1.

        Show
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - not critical so moving to 2.1.
        Hide
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment -

        moving all non-critical 2.1.3 Jiras to 2.1.4

        Show
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - moving all non-critical 2.1.3 Jiras to 2.1.4
        Hide
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment -

        Still pursuing some recommendations for browser support from the TRC. However, after a conversation with Eric and Jerry, we recommended that KFS list the versions KFS testers used to test version 5.0.2. Then on Rice, we would list what we tested with in our documentation. Other projects would do the same. So, the TRC would set recommendations, but then each project would test with what they can from that list.

        Our next comprehensive round of testing would come in with 2.3, so I'm moving this Jira to that version for now.

        Show
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - Still pursuing some recommendations for browser support from the TRC. However, after a conversation with Eric and Jerry, we recommended that KFS list the versions KFS testers used to test version 5.0.2. Then on Rice, we would list what we tested with in our documentation. Other projects would do the same. So, the TRC would set recommendations, but then each project would test with what they can from that list. Our next comprehensive round of testing would come in with 2.3, so I'm moving this Jira to that version for now.
        Hide
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment -

        Christie from UXI has agreed to lead a TRC working group on browser support and hopefully some recommendations will come out of that. Moving to the Backlog for now.

        Show
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - Christie from UXI has agreed to lead a TRC working group on browser support and hopefully some recommendations will come out of that. Moving to the Backlog for now.
        Hide
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment -

        removing myself as assignee

        Show
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - removing myself as assignee

          People

          • Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Eric Westfall
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:

              Structure Helper Panel