Uploaded image for project: 'Kuali Rice Development'
  1. Kuali Rice Development
  2. KULRICE-6130

Document various "validate" methods on KimTypeService


    • Type: Task
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: Not version specific
    • Component/s: Documentation
    • Labels:
    • Rice Module:


      Ailish sent the following to the Rice dev list in response to a question about the purpose of these different methods, notice her concern on the differences in return types for these:

      validateAttributes: make sure the values are the right size and shape and if there is a reference table that they exist and are active

      validateUniqueAttributes: make sure the principal doesn't have another assignment with the same values for these unique attributes

      validateAttributesAgainstExisting: seems like this is just giving the opportunity to provide a good error for validateUniqueAttributes, given the different return vals and the fact that the example i see in kfs... they are being used in conjunction with one another? location of the method at the end of kim type service base also leads me to believe this was an afterthought, and perhaps refatoring should have been done to make all validate methods return an attribute set instead of a boolean?

      validateUnmodifiableAttributes: make sure the values on the assignment that are considered keys are not changed during an edit... for example for accounting organization hierarchy... chart, org, and doc type cannot change during an edit... but from and to amount and override code can

      not sure if you're looking at kfs code, but the best reference implementations would be there.



          jcoltrin Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment -

          closing old documentation JIRAs

          jcoltrin Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - closing old documentation JIRAs


            • Assignee:
              agodert Aaron Godert (Inactive)
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              0 Start watching this issue


              • Created: