Kuali Rice Development
  1. Kuali Rice Development
  2. KULRICE-7312

Client-side validation tooltip doesn't open (for timed interval) when other validation treatment is applied

    Details

    • Similar issues:
      KULRICE-7026Alter behavior of client side validation
      KULRICE-6835Issues with client side validation
      KULRICE-4708Support for client side field validation
      KULRICE-7158Validation messaging - single checkbox tooltip persists/open
      KULRICE-10933Input field validation tooltips displays twice in lightbox
      KULRICE-5156Validate client side flag on view not being looked at for client side validation
      KULRICE-9032cancelling a document with client side validation disabled
      KULRICE-14261Enable client side validation in dialogs (backport KULRICE-12235)
      KULRICE-7339Adhoc routing for completion - client side validation
      KULRICE-8074Getting client side validation errors when no errors are present
    • Epic Link:
    • Rice Module:
      KRAD
    • Application Requirement:
      Rice
    • KAI Review Status:
      Not Required
    • KTI Review Status:
      Not Required

      Description

      This behavior was in the reqs/spec but had to be taken out in M1 because of other code-level problems it caused (related to how the tooltip plug-in handled this). It is still desired, so am logging this as a bug (to re-include, if we can fix the ancillary code problems).

      This relates to the first time a field is flagged with a client-side validation error (when user moves focus out of the field). In M1, the field gets the validation message border treatment (all fields) and the validation message icon applied (except in tables/collections). The intended design also included the tooltip opening for a timed interval, then fading. (User can re-open it at any time by returning focus to the field.)

        Activity

        Hide
        Jerry Neal (Inactive) added a comment -

        William,

        Would you add your opinion on this issue?

        thanks,
        Jerry

        Show
        Jerry Neal (Inactive) added a comment - William, Would you add your opinion on this issue? thanks, Jerry
        Hide
        Brian Smith (Inactive) added a comment -

        I would prefer actual user testing to support any theories on this, as I've already changed it once based on a theory.

        Show
        Brian Smith (Inactive) added a comment - I would prefer actual user testing to support any theories on this, as I've already changed it once based on a theory.
        Hide
        Jerry Neal (Inactive) added a comment -

        I agree

        Show
        Jerry Neal (Inactive) added a comment - I agree
        Hide
        William Washington (Inactive) added a comment -

        I agree w/Brian. I suspect we may end up needing to add this back in, but it's worth waiting for some input from users once this is in use, or formal user testing (resources permitted).

        Show
        William Washington (Inactive) added a comment - I agree w/Brian. I suspect we may end up needing to add this back in, but it's worth waiting for some input from users once this is in use, or formal user testing (resources permitted).
        Hide
        Claus Niesen added a comment -

        Closing, not relevant anymore.

        Show
        Claus Niesen added a comment - Closing, not relevant anymore.

          People

          • Assignee:
            William Washington (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Candace Soderston (Inactive)
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Structure Helper Panel