Details

    • Type: Task Task
    • Status: Closed Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 2.5
    • Component/s: Development
    • Security Level: Public (Public: Anyone can view)
    • Labels:
      None
    • Similar issues:
      KULRICE-9282Upgrade selenium-java webdriver to latest version
      KULRICE-14162Upgrade to the latest jquery-ui version (1.11.x)
      KULRICE-9731Upgrade Rice to the latest version of the Spring Framework 3.2.x
      KULRICE-9145Upgrade mysql version references from 5.1.18 to latest
      KULRICE-5396Convert InactivatableFromTo to use joda-time
      KULRICE-4920Upgrade Hudson
      KULRICE-1351upgrade htmlunit to version 1.13
      KULRICE-9737Check what the latest version of Spring is prior to the beginning of QA
      KULRICE-9670Upgrade to Eclipselink 2.5
    • Rice Module:
      Rice Core
    • KAI Review Status:
      Not Required
    • KTI Review Status:
      Not Required

      Issue Links

        Activity

        Hide
        Travis Schneeberger added a comment -

        At the UH implementation, we decided to use joda-time within the KFS project. Just noticed that there is a new bugfix release than what rice is currently using.

        Show
        Travis Schneeberger added a comment - At the UH implementation, we decided to use joda-time within the KFS project. Just noticed that there is a new bugfix release than what rice is currently using.
        Hide
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment -

        assigning to 2.2 for DM review.

        Show
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - assigning to 2.2 for DM review.
        Hide
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment -

        assigning to 2.3 for review for that version.

        Show
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - assigning to 2.3 for review for that version.
        Hide
        Larry Symms added a comment -

        retagged as KFS

        Show
        Larry Symms added a comment - retagged as KFS
        Hide
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment -

        just checked and we're still using version 2.0 of joda-time in Rice 2.4. Putting in 2.5 so we can address at the beginning of 2.5 development.

        Show
        Jessica Coltrin (Inactive) added a comment - just checked and we're still using version 2.0 of joda-time in Rice 2.4. Putting in 2.5 so we can address at the beginning of 2.5 development.
        Hide
        Peter Giles (Inactive) added a comment -

        Our jota-time dependency has been bumped to 2.4 as part of KULRICE-12563

        Show
        Peter Giles (Inactive) added a comment - Our jota-time dependency has been bumped to 2.4 as part of KULRICE-12563
        Hide
        James Smith added a comment -

        Not a KFS project requirement as far as the project team is concerned. Won't Java 8 solve this anyway? Thanks!

        Show
        James Smith added a comment - Not a KFS project requirement as far as the project team is concerned. Won't Java 8 solve this anyway? Thanks!
        Hide
        Peter Giles (Inactive) added a comment -

        Possibly, however:

        • Generally speaking, we want to be on newer versions of living libraries.
        • I'm not clear what the timeline to move Rice off of Java 7 is, but I expect it will be a while.
        • Also, I'd wager that moving to JSR-310 will be an impacting change since the packages are different.
        • This was requested by KC, so presumably this increment will help them in some way.
        Show
        Peter Giles (Inactive) added a comment - Possibly, however: Generally speaking, we want to be on newer versions of living libraries. I'm not clear what the timeline to move Rice off of Java 7 is, but I expect it will be a while. Also, I'd wager that moving to JSR-310 will be an impacting change since the packages are different. This was requested by KC, so presumably this increment will help them in some way.
        Hide
        James Smith added a comment -

        That makes sense. We're completely not opposed to upgrading joda time at all; we're just reviewing jiras where KFS is marked as an interested application and this one didn't seem to fit. Thanks Peter!

        Show
        James Smith added a comment - That makes sense. We're completely not opposed to upgrading joda time at all; we're just reviewing jiras where KFS is marked as an interested application and this one didn't seem to fit. Thanks Peter!

          People

          • Assignee:
            Peter Giles (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            Travis Schneeberger
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Structure Helper Panel