Kuali Rice Development
  1. Kuali Rice Development
  2. KULRICE-8271

partially masked field can't be masked properly (RQ_PO_0316)

    Details

    • Type: Bug Fix Bug Fix
    • Status: Closed Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 2.1.3
    • Component/s: Development
    • Security Level: Public (Public: Anyone can view)
    • Labels:
      None
    • Similar issues:
      KULRICE-10461Create Web Tests for KRAD Maintenance Document Masked Fields
      KULRICE-4004Partial mask not working in transactional documents
      KULRICE-10308Lookup: Check that masked fields are reset properly with "clear value"
      KULRICE-9634Allow data entry into masked field if a new document is created
      KULRICE-9076Fix Criteria Masking on Lookups with encrypted fields
      KULRICE-10272KRAD Demo Lookups Account name is now editable and not masked.
      KULRICE-10896KNS transactional documents are unable to mask their fields
      KULRICE-11307AFT Failure Kitchen Sink Other Fields attribute security failures and DemoFieldsDataAft masking failures
      KULRICE-4390Parital masking of value incorrectly displaying 1 extra unmasked character
      KULRICE-2961Mask and partialMask restrictions not handled properly in transactional documents
    • Application Requirement:
      KFS
    • KAI Review Status:
      Not Required
    • KTI Review Status:
      Not Required
    • Contributing Institution:
      Michigan State Univ

      Description

      partially masked field can't be masked properly

      As showed in the snapshot, procurement card number is defined as partial masked restriction field via DD. However, when display this field, Rice didn't take care of partial masked field the same way as fully masked field. So we added the fix to allow partial masked field to be masked properly.

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          Kathy Beno added a comment -

          Where do we stand on this KULRICE?

          Show
          Kathy Beno added a comment - Where do we stand on this KULRICE?
          Hide
          Bin Gao added a comment -

          code review completed

          Show
          Bin Gao added a comment - code review completed

            People

            • Assignee:
              Bin Gao
              Reporter:
              Kathy Beno
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Structure Helper Panel